Do you know there are similarities between a boxer and a lawyer before they begin their battle?

Contrary to popular belief, filing a lawsuit is very similar to a boxing bout. The main distinction is that there is no physical combat. There is a 'Boxing Ring'. That is the COURTROOM, that is where the legal GLADIATORS battle out your case!

Let me tell you a funny story explaining the similarities between a boxer and a lawyer:-






A lawyer and a boxer were seated next to one another on an aircraft one day. While the boxer was viewing video of his opponent on his laptop, the lawyer was going over legal documents. After some time passed, the boxer addressed the attorney, "Hey, what are you doing there?" I'm getting ready for my next court case, the attorney retorted. To win, I must be sure I am well informed and possess the strongest arguments.




"Yeah, I understand what you mean," the boxer replied, nodding. I'm analysing my opponent's actions to determine the best course of action to defeat him. To succeed, both of us must be organised and committed.



The plane suddenly encountered turbulence, sending the lawyer's paperwork flying all over the place. The boxer instantly reacted and caught the papers before they hit the ground with his lightning-fast reflexes. Wow, you have some wonderful reflexes!' the lawyer replied to the boxer, turning to face him in admiration. Have you ever considered pursuing a career in law? With a smile, the boxer retorted, "No way, man! I don't want to argue about the law all day. To be done with it, I'd rather just smack someone in the face.





The Lawyer shook his head and laughed. I guess we have more in common than I originally believed. Simply put, we both want to prevail in our conflicts. Each man was engrossed in his own thoughts about the forthcoming conflicts as they both laughed and sat back down. So since it is a true fight in court, here is how both a lawyer and a boxer would prepare for their respective fights:





1. Being Prepared: Before their fights, both boxers and Lawyers must spend a lot of time practising. Boxers must work on their physical conditioning, hone their skills, and research the strengths and weaknesses of their rivals. Lawyers must conduct research, analyse cases, create arguments, and foresee the opposition's counterarguments. 2. Technique: Both boxers and attorneys must adopt a tactical strategy for their conflicts. Boxers must choose between an offensive and defensive approach, as well as which punches to throw at their opponents. Lawyers must choose which legal points to highlight and how to persuade a judge or jury of their validity.




3. Self-assurance:

Before a fight, both boxers and Lawyers need to be confident in their skills. Lawyers must have confidence in their legal expertise, critical thinking abilities, and capacity for effective communication, much as boxers must have confidence in their physical prowess, stamina, and technique. 4. Adversaries include:
Both boxers and Lawyers are up against people who want to defeat them. While lawyers are up against opposing counsel who want to win their cases, boxers are up against opponents who want to knock them out. The opponents are pressuring them to provide their best effort in both situations.


Overall, there may be numerous parallels between a boxer and a lawyer before a fight, but the most significant one may be the requirement for planning, strategy, confidence, and focus to win.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I merely shared a defamatory statement made by someone else, am i liable for Defamation?

Image
 WELL YES! A republication of a defamatory statement is also considered to be defamatory. In the case of YB Hj Khalid bin Abdul Samad v Datuk Aziz bin Isham & Anor [2012] 7 MLJ 301, the High Court quoted Gatley on Libel and Slander (8th Ed), at p 117 which states that "every republication of a libel is a new libel and each publisher is answerable for his act to the same extent as if the calumny originated with him". Accordingly, every repost or share of a defamatory statement is considered a new publication because those who do so are deemed to have approved, endorsed or repeated the same. This position was reiterated in the recent Court of Appeal case of Raja Syahrir bin Abu Bakar & Anor v Manjeet Singh Dhillon and other appeals [2019] MLJU 75. Therefore please be careful with what you share in social media as this can land you in very expensive litigation.
Read more

Time to lawyer up and get your will sorted! What do you need to bring along?

Image
Making a WILL can seem like an uphill task, but it is necessary to make sure that all your assets are properly divided when you pass away in line with your wishes and preferences. Don't be fooled into thinking only the uber-rich or complicated peeps need wills. A WILL is a smart move for everyone! Here's why: Call the shots on who gets what when you're gone. Keep those precious assets away from any undesirables (no offense to Aunt Michelle). Handpick who takes care of your little ones. Don't let the courts decide! Give your heirs a quicker and smoother path to their inheritance (who doesn't like less drama?). Plan ahead to save your estate some cash-money and even do some good in the world with charitable donations. Winning all around!  Well... Many clients have this one question to ask when they call to set an appointment to draw up their WILL. What are the documents and/or information I should bring along for our meeting? Here you go:- 1.      A copy of your IC (I
Read more

Unlocking the Legal Potential of Whatsapp: How Chat Messages Hold Weight in Debt Recovery Cases

Image
One question that frequently arises in legal discussions is whether Whatsapp messages can be utilized as evidence in court, even in debt recovery cases. Many individuals mistakenly assume that Whatsapp's informal nature would render its messages inadmissible. However, let me tell you an interesting story that showcases the contrary. Consider a recent debt recovery case, where Mr. Lee was pursuing payment from Mr. Tan, who had borrowed a substantial sum of money. Frustrated with the lack of progress, Mr. Lee decided to turn to Whatsapp messages as evidence of their loan agreement. Now, you might wonder, would these seemingly casual chats hold any weight in a courtroom? The answer is a resounding yes! Allow me to introduce you to the captivating case of Mok Yii Chek v Sovo Sdn Bhd & Ors [2015] MLRHU 196. In this particular legal battle, the High Court shed light on the admissibility of Whatsapp messages in a debt recovery scenario. The court declared that print-outs of emails and
Read more