Saya dipecat oleh Boss saya, apa yang perlu saya lakukan?

 


Anda dalam perjalanan ke tempat kerja. Ia seperti mana-mana pagi biasa. Setelah tiba di pejabat, anda cuba menclock masuk, tetapi anda mendapat mesej ralat. Tiba-tiba, bos anda datang dan memberitahu anda bahawa anda telah dipecat kerana selalu lewat datang kerja. Anda terkejut kerana anda tahu anda selalu hadir tepat pada waktunya, dan anda ingin menjelaskan diri. Tetapi bos anda memberitahu anda untuk mengambil barang-barang anda dan meninggalkan pejabat.

Anda baru sahaja dipecat secara tidak adil. Alih-alih menerima kekalahan, anda ingin mengambil tindakan undang-undang terhadap bos anda. Tetapi... di mana anda harus memulakan?

Mahkamah Perusahaan - mahkamah yang mendengar semua perkara pekerjaan - berfungsi sedikit berbeza berbanding dengan mahkamah biasa.

Dalam mahkamah biasa, kes didengar oleh satu atau lebih hakim dan keputusan dibuat. Keputusan ini boleh dibuat rayuan ke mahkamah yang lebih tinggi kecuali jika anda sudah mencapai mahkamah terakhir.

Keputusan Mahkamah Perusahaan dikenali sebagai "AWARD" - juga boleh dibuat rayuan, tetapi prosesnya sedikit berbeza. Dan tidak seperti mahkamah biasa yang akan memberi tumpuan kepada menjatuhkan hukuman atau memberi pampasan kepada seseorang, Mahkamah Perusahaan boleh memberi anda pampasan wang ATAU mendapatkan syarikat anda memberi anda pekerjaan anda semula.

Anda boleh melantik peguam untuk memfailkan kes dengan tepat. Pastikan anda mengumpul bukti apa sahaja yang anda ada untuk menunjukkan bahawa anda mempunyai kes yang baik. Contohnya, kenaikan pangkat untuk menunjukkan rekod yang baik dan sebagainya.

Terdapat lima Mahkamah Perusahaan di Malaysia, di Kuala Lumpur, Johor, Perak, Pulau Pinang, Sabah dan Sarawak.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I merely shared a defamatory statement made by someone else, am i liable for Defamation?

Image
 WELL YES! A republication of a defamatory statement is also considered to be defamatory. In the case of YB Hj Khalid bin Abdul Samad v Datuk Aziz bin Isham & Anor [2012] 7 MLJ 301, the High Court quoted Gatley on Libel and Slander (8th Ed), at p 117 which states that "every republication of a libel is a new libel and each publisher is answerable for his act to the same extent as if the calumny originated with him". Accordingly, every repost or share of a defamatory statement is considered a new publication because those who do so are deemed to have approved, endorsed or repeated the same. This position was reiterated in the recent Court of Appeal case of Raja Syahrir bin Abu Bakar & Anor v Manjeet Singh Dhillon and other appeals [2019] MLJU 75. Therefore please be careful with what you share in social media as this can land you in very expensive litigation.
Read more

Time to lawyer up and get your will sorted! What do you need to bring along?

Image
Making a WILL can seem like an uphill task, but it is necessary to make sure that all your assets are properly divided when you pass away in line with your wishes and preferences. Don't be fooled into thinking only the uber-rich or complicated peeps need wills. A WILL is a smart move for everyone! Here's why: Call the shots on who gets what when you're gone. Keep those precious assets away from any undesirables (no offense to Aunt Michelle). Handpick who takes care of your little ones. Don't let the courts decide! Give your heirs a quicker and smoother path to their inheritance (who doesn't like less drama?). Plan ahead to save your estate some cash-money and even do some good in the world with charitable donations. Winning all around!  Well... Many clients have this one question to ask when they call to set an appointment to draw up their WILL. What are the documents and/or information I should bring along for our meeting? Here you go:- 1.      A copy of your IC (I
Read more

Unlocking the Legal Potential of Whatsapp: How Chat Messages Hold Weight in Debt Recovery Cases

Image
One question that frequently arises in legal discussions is whether Whatsapp messages can be utilized as evidence in court, even in debt recovery cases. Many individuals mistakenly assume that Whatsapp's informal nature would render its messages inadmissible. However, let me tell you an interesting story that showcases the contrary. Consider a recent debt recovery case, where Mr. Lee was pursuing payment from Mr. Tan, who had borrowed a substantial sum of money. Frustrated with the lack of progress, Mr. Lee decided to turn to Whatsapp messages as evidence of their loan agreement. Now, you might wonder, would these seemingly casual chats hold any weight in a courtroom? The answer is a resounding yes! Allow me to introduce you to the captivating case of Mok Yii Chek v Sovo Sdn Bhd & Ors [2015] MLRHU 196. In this particular legal battle, the High Court shed light on the admissibility of Whatsapp messages in a debt recovery scenario. The court declared that print-outs of emails and
Read more